Page 9

0 Comments

A: The mother claims the father “did not say” he was going to her house, contradicting the fact that he has repeatedly stated that was indeed his destination in the text messages shown in this exchange.

B: The father goes on to remind the mother that this is the third week he has returned the child to her home between 5:30 and 6:30. It appears that the mother might be attempting to manufacture inconsistency on the part of the father, ignoring the fact that both sides of this text message exchange could be used as evidence of what actually transpired.

PREV | NEXT

Related Posts

Page 15

A: In a transparent attempt to maintain her false sense…

Page 18

After numerous disturbing threats and insinuations, the mother repeatedly telephones…

Page 14

The necessity of this analysis becomes apparent here, at point…